Proposal for a new competition
log in |
Message boards : Cafe : Proposal for a new competition
Author | Message |
---|---|
Some members of the team L'Alliance Francophone are thinking about the creation of a new annual ranking : the Rush BOINC . | |
ID: 1865 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
The proposal is too inflexible and too time consuming. It seems to favor large teams over smaller ones. It adds a layer of organization and timing that is completely unnecessary for achieving the goals of distributed computing. | |
ID: 1866 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Also, only 6 teams seem to be actively pursuing Formula BOINC "trophies" under rules that require far less planning and regimentation to succeed. The proposal, requiring about two 3-day rushes per month, repeated up to 3 times, completely disrupts the achievement individual crunching goals, and it will make FB completely irrelevant and ignored. | |
ID: 1867 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Repeat a rush is facultative. 20 rushes equals only 60 days in the year. | |
ID: 1868 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
My team uses two different team names across the BOINC world and finds Formula BOINC to not adjust accordingly. When I asked about ways to resolve this nothing happened. So, I agree that it seems only a small hand full of teams actually participate there. DC Vault has many teams and can track teams that have multiple names but have little activity within their forums. I don't see this concept being much different. | |
ID: 1869 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
20-25 * 3 days * 3 tries = 180 - 225 days | |
ID: 1870 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards :
Cafe :
Proposal for a new competition