QCN Continual hours lost
log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : QCN Continual hours lost
Author | Message |
---|---|
My QCN Continual hours were reduced by 7294 hours - database error? | |
ID: 5488 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
My QCN Continual hours were reduced by 7294 hours - database error? See this thread: http://wuprop.boinc-af.org/forum_thread.php?id=441 | |
ID: 5489 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
My QCN Continual hours were reduced by 7294 hours - database error? Wrong thread - I'm running 2 (real) sensors. | |
ID: 5490 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I had quite a few hours pulled as well. And they were not from multi-clients as suggested by the admin during his latest crusade. The badges hold little merit these days. | |
ID: 5493 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
There's a new list in the stats: | |
ID: 5494 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
There's a new list in the stats: Do you mean the new link on the Your Account page? One of my two hosts running QCN with sensor is listed. I wonder if his detection does not see the older JoyWarrior sensor. The one not listed has a newer NAVI. ____________ | |
ID: 5495 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have checked this new page and found that WUProp thinks that I run Radioactive@Home without sensor. You can check my account at R@H that my tasks are validated, credits awarded and collected data presented on radioactivity map. This new page is faulty. | |
ID: 5496 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I fixed a problem on the page. Some valid hosts were wrongly displayed. | |
ID: 5497 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I fixed a problem on the page. Some valid hosts were wrongly displayed. Thanks, my list is empty now. ____________ | |
ID: 5498 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I fixed a problem on the page. Some valid hosts were wrongly displayed. My list is empty now, too. But what's the matter with the lost hours at QCN Continual? | |
ID: 5499 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Unfortunately the one system on my list without a sensor was given away a long time ago but allowed to leave BOINC on it. However, those projects were manually added a very long time ago and unable to be pulled with BAM!. So, are you saying that host was responsible for the loss of 20k hours on both those QCN projects? | |
ID: 5502 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Unfortunately the one system on my list without a sensor was given away a long time ago but allowed to leave BOINC on it. However, those projects were manually added a very long time ago and unable to be pulled with BAM!. So, are you saying that host was responsible for the loss of 20k hours on both those QCN projects? QCN News says that they have temporary data problems and I was thinking that the project is responsible for the loss. Just at this moment I registered the new 'Hosts running nci apps w/o sensor'-list . So I would appreciate a statement from Sebastien about this coincidence. | |
ID: 5506 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Run time hours are not affected here by the projects doing backups/losses/etc... They are collected by the WUProp application and tallied here. If it were points being listed on a stats site, then yes that could change things. But the run time hours collected here not so much. | |
ID: 5507 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sebastien, could you please correct the lost hours? | |
ID: 5511 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Before my holidays I had four of my six QCN project 'traveling together', collecting more or less the same amount of hours as they were all added on the same day to the same Raspberry Pi with SenseHat (including an accelerometer). When I came back from holidays the Pi was bricked, and so were my stats for the various QCN projects. | |
ID: 5562 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hello Sebastien, | |
ID: 5569 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Another month without an answer from the admin. :-( | |
ID: 5638 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
QCN Continual hours lost