Run on tasks


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Run on tasks

AuthorMessage
John McLeod VII

Send message
Joined: Apr 13 10
Posts: 4
Credit: 330,178
RAC: 87
Message 251 - Posted 19 Jul 2010 14:03:32 UTC

    All of the tasks on one set of machines seems to have gone well over the 12 hours that is typical recently. All of them are up over 2.5 days of wall time, some of them are up to over 6 days of wall time.

    BOINC will not upload and report until they stop running. BOINC will not contact the project web site until they stop running. Someplace the internal stop signal seems to have gone missing.

    Profile [AF>WildWildWest]Sebastien

    Project administrator
    Avatar
    Send message
    Joined: Mar 28 10
    Posts: 155
    Credit: 128,450
    RAC: 123
    Message 255 - Posted 23 Jul 2010 7:00:44 UTC - in response to Message 251.

      It seems theere is a problem with version 6.11.x
      I'm on hollydays, so I can't compile new application.
      I will release new applications in August.
      ____________

      Profile [c@b] Ogliagh

      Send message
      Joined: Apr 7 10
      Posts: 1
      Credit: 152,174
      RAC: 82
      Message 256 - Posted 28 Jul 2010 9:51:48 UTC - in response to Message 255.

        Hello, I´ve the same problem with 6.11.4 and Win XP (32b). Progress bar is at 0 % all the time.

        Profile Sorceress
        Avatar
        Send message
        Joined: Jul 25 10
        Posts: 13
        Credit: 33,946
        RAC: 0
        Message 260 - Posted 29 Jul 2010 15:20:06 UTC

          Last modified: 29 Jul 2010 15:27:11 UTC

          Sebastien,

          I would think that as 6.11.x is in beta testing. it might be prudent to continue with the current apps until 6.11.x is released to the public. Designing apps to run on the beta may be a waste of time. Many things will change as the bugs are worked out. I know many users like to keep up with the current upgrades but you can be asking for troubles (as is stated in the disclaimer). I would prefer to have work for my computer and wait til the beta is released to the public to see if any changes are needed. Just my $.02 worth

          Augustine
          Avatar
          Send message
          Joined: Apr 6 10
          Posts: 37
          Credit: 124,317
          RAC: 160
          Message 263 - Posted 29 Jul 2010 18:17:28 UTC - in response to Message 255.

            It seems theere is a problem with version 6.11.x.

            Or you could stop sending work just to the 6.11.x clients...
            ____________

            Pepo
            Avatar
            Send message
            Joined: May 10 10
            Posts: 15
            Credit: 49,025
            RAC: 0
            Message 433 - Posted 3 Feb 2011 20:42:01 UTC - in response to Message 251.

              Last modified: 3 Feb 2011 20:48:31 UTC

              I've just similar problem with DC 2.31 task wu_1295715071_80772_0. Its Elapsed time is 68:25:24 hours, progress 34.482% and does not seem to increment. It is consuming (some) CPU cycles, used 9 CPU seconds (other tasks on the machine used around 23-25 seconds for 100% - seems to correspond to the progress) has network connections open, but does not seem to be willing to go home after the usual 12 hours...

              Peter

              Pepo
              Avatar
              Send message
              Joined: May 10 10
              Posts: 15
              Credit: 49,025
              RAC: 0
              Message 434 - Posted 4 Feb 2011 11:25:38 UTC - in response to Message 433.

                Last modified: 4 Feb 2011 11:26:34 UTC

                No progress in next 15-16 hours... I've tried to abort the task (simplified log, removed new task's download and start):

                12:01:01 | task wu_1295715071_80772_0 aborted by user
                12:01:01 | [task] task_state=ABORT_PENDING for wu_1295715071_80772_0 from abort_task
                12:01:01 | [sched_op] Reason: Unrecoverable error for task wu_1295715071_80772_0 (aborted by user)
                12:01:01 | [task] result state=COMPUTE_ERROR for wu_1295715071_80772_0 from CS::report_result_error
                12:01:01 | [task] result state=ABORTED for wu_1295715071_80772_0 from abort_task


                Upon updating the project, something went wrong:
                12:01:28 | update requested by user
                12:01:31 | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
                12:01:31 | Reporting 1 completed tasks
                12:01:33 | [sched_op] Server version 611
                12:01:33 | [sched_op] handle_scheduler_reply(): got ack for task wu_1295715071_80772_0
                12:01:33 | [error] garbage_collect(); still have active task for acked result wu_1295715071_80772_0; state 5
                12:01:33 | [task] task_state=ABORTED for wu_1295715071_80772_0 from abort_task
                12:01:33 | [task] result state=ABORTED for wu_1295715071_80772_0 from abort_task
                12:01:34 | Computation for task wu_1295715071_80772_0 finished
                12:01:34 | [task] result state=COMPUTE_ERROR for wu_1295715071_80772_0 from CS::app_finished
                12:01:37 | Started upload of wu_1295715071_80772_0_0
                12:01:38 | [error] Couldn't delete file projects/wuprop.boinc-af.org/wu_1295715071_80772
                12:01:38 | [error] Couldn't delete file projects/wuprop.boinc-af.org/wu_1295715071_80772_0_0


                The task data still exists. I've found out that it could not be deleted, because its process also still exists and has opened handles on the files. But they were already gone from client_state.xml, so it was enough to kill the process and delete the files.

                Just a reboot would heal it without manual intervention :-(

                Peter

                Alyx
                Send message
                Joined: Oct 6 10
                Posts: 1
                Credit: 113,850
                RAC: 0
                Message 435 - Posted 4 Feb 2011 19:29:18 UTC - in response to Message 434.

                  Same for me. I had a task going for over 34 hours that I aborted.

                  2/4/2011 11:27:22 AM WUProp@Home task wu_1295715071_102159_0 aborted by user
                  2/4/2011 11:27:43 AM WUProp@Home update requested by user
                  2/4/2011 11:27:47 AM WUProp@Home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
                  2/4/2011 11:27:47 AM WUProp@Home Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU
                  2/4/2011 11:27:51 AM WUProp@Home Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
                  2/4/2011 11:27:51 AM WUProp@Home [error] garbage_collect(); still have active task for acked result wu_1295715071_102159_0; state 5
                  2/4/2011 11:27:52 AM WUProp@Home Computation for task wu_1295715071_102159_0 finished
                  2/4/2011 11:27:54 AM WUProp@Home Started download of wu_1295715071_115172
                  2/4/2011 11:27:55 AM WUProp@Home Finished download of wu_1295715071_115172
                  2/4/2011 11:27:55 AM WUProp@Home Started upload of wu_1295715071_102159_0_0
                  2/4/2011 11:27:55 AM WUProp@Home Starting wu_1295715071_115172_0
                  2/4/2011 11:27:55 AM WUProp@Home Starting task wu_1295715071_115172_0 using data_collect version 231
                  2/4/2011 11:27:56 AM WUProp@Home Finished upload of wu_1295715071_102159_0_0
                  2/4/2011 11:28:02 AM WUProp@Home [error] Couldn't delete file projects/wuprop.boinc-af.org/wu_1295715071_102159_0_0
                  2/4/2011 11:28:07 AM WUProp@Home [error] Couldn't delete file projects/wuprop.boinc-af.org/wu_1295715071_102159

                  Pepo
                  Avatar
                  Send message
                  Joined: May 10 10
                  Posts: 15
                  Credit: 49,025
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 436 - Posted 8 Feb 2011 14:40:55 UTC - in response to Message 434.

                    A few minutes ago my system was so busy, that all BOINC tasks restarted. Well, nearly all - a DC 2.31 task wu_1295715071_124441_0 (I can not add its URL /wuprop.boinc-af.org/result.php?resultid=2048362 because of Akismet kicking in) stayed. Then I've noticed it is already more than two days old and does not progress at all (at 53.793%).

                    After being started on 6.2. 0:03:55, its last sign of life happened on 6.02.2011 6:29:12. And nothing more, no use of CPU cycles or context switches...

                    06.02.2011 0:03:55 | WUProp@Home | Starting task wu_1295715071_124441_0 using data_collect version 231
                    06.02.2011 0:03:58 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_124441_0 checkpointed
                    ......
                    06.02.2011 6:29:12 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_124441_0 checkpointed


                    I had to kill and restart it manually.

                    Peter

                    Pepo
                    Avatar
                    Send message
                    Joined: May 10 10
                    Posts: 15
                    Credit: 49,025
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 439 - Posted 9 Feb 2011 15:17:24 UTC - in response to Message 436.

                      One more DC 2.31 task (wu_1295715071_147548_0 (I can not add its URL /wuprop.boinc-af.org/result.php?resultid=2072478 because of Akismet)), that lost its sense of time. More than one day old and does not progress (starved at 43.448%).

                      08.02.2011 15:36:53 | WUProp@Home | Starting task wu_1295715071_147548_0 using data_collect version 231
                      08.02.2011 15:36:57 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_147548_0 checkpointed
                      ......
                      08.02.2011 20:47:01 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_147548_0 checkpointed


                      Killed.
                      It seems to me that it happens more than "occasionally"...

                      Peter

                      Pepo
                      Avatar
                      Send message
                      Joined: May 10 10
                      Posts: 15
                      Credit: 49,025
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 440 - Posted 9 Feb 2011 15:42:24 UTC - in response to Message 439.

                        I've noticed that when I abort such "sleepy" task, their output merely tells "aborted by user".

                        But I've killed the last two tasks' processes. Their existing output remains untouched... voilà!

                        The yesterday's one:

                        wu_1295715071_124441_0 Workunit 1994204 Task 2048362 wrote:

                        06.02.2011 0:03:55 | WUProp@Home | Starting task wu_1295715071_124441_0 using data_collect version 231
                        06.02.2011 0:03:58 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_124441_0 checkpointed
                        ......
                        06.02.2011 6:29:12 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_124441_0 checkpointed

                        A hard crash a few seconds later:
                        <message>
                        Nesprávna funkcia. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                        </message>
                        <stderr_txt>
                        Initialisation
                        00:03:56 (16912): connection socket active_results
                        00:03:56 (16912): connection socket state
                        00:03:56 (16912): connection socket file_transfer
                        06:29:10 (16912): Timeout reception.
                        06:29:10 (16912): data incomplete.
                        06:29:21 (16912): erreur chargement file_transfer

                        Unhandled Exception Detected...

                        - Unhandled Exception Record -
                        Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004373C1 read attempt to address 0x05BE8A25

                        Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...

                        </stderr_txt>


                        and the today's one:
                        wu_1295715071_147548_0 Workunit 2017311 Task 2072478 wrote:

                        08.02.2011 15:36:53 | WUProp@Home | Starting task wu_1295715071_147548_0 using data_collect version 231
                        08.02.2011 15:36:57 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_147548_0 checkpointed
                        ......
                        08.02.2011 20:47:01 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_147548_0 checkpointed

                        A hard crash a few minutes later:
                        <message>
                        Nesprávna funkcia. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                        </message>
                        <stderr_txt>
                        Initialisation
                        15:36:54 (18752): connection socket active_results
                        15:36:54 (18752): connection socket state
                        15:36:54 (18752): connection socket file_transfer
                        16:54:21 (18752): Timeout reception.
                        16:54:21 (18752): data incomplete.
                        18:47:16 (18752): Timeout reception.
                        18:47:16 (18752): data incomplete.
                        20:40:27 (18752): Timeout reception.
                        20:40:27 (18752): data incomplete.
                        20:49:39 (18752): Timeout reception.
                        20:49:39 (18752): data incomplete.
                        20:50:34 (18752): erreur chargement file_transfer

                        Unhandled Exception Detected...

                        - Unhandled Exception Record -
                        Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004373C1 read attempt to address 0x89EE6166

                        Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...

                        </stderr_txt>


                        In both cases the code apparently crashed at the same instruction. Devs??

                        Peter

                        Profile [AF>WildWildWest]Sebastien

                        Project administrator
                        Avatar
                        Send message
                        Joined: Mar 28 10
                        Posts: 155
                        Credit: 128,450
                        RAC: 123
                        Message 441 - Posted 9 Feb 2011 20:22:12 UTC - in response to Message 440.

                          I released a new application which should solve the problem.
                          ____________

                          Pepo
                          Avatar
                          Send message
                          Joined: May 10 10
                          Posts: 15
                          Credit: 49,025
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 443 - Posted 9 Feb 2011 22:10:04 UTC - in response to Message 441.

                            I released a new application which should solve the problem.

                            Thanks, I'm looking forward!

                            I'll keep it in eye ,-)

                            Peter

                            Pepo
                            Avatar
                            Send message
                            Joined: May 10 10
                            Posts: 15
                            Credit: 49,025
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 447 - Posted 10 Feb 2011 11:53:45 UTC - in response to Message 443.

                              I released a new application which should solve the problem.

                              Thanks, I'm looking forward!
                              I'll keep it in eye ,-)

                              At the evening, after your post, I've noticed my other host has already grabbed the newer 2.33, but the host where I've been observing the problems still had a 2.31 task, which had to lock up (at 79.310%, 20:27:40 elapsed) to tell me its farewell :-D

                              OK, I've thrown it away and grabbed a shiny new 2.33 one, I'm wishing it all best...

                              Peter

                              Pepo
                              Avatar
                              Send message
                              Joined: May 10 10
                              Posts: 15
                              Credit: 49,025
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 449 - Posted 11 Feb 2011 13:42:28 UTC - in response to Message 447.

                                I released a new application which should solve the problem.

                                Thanks, I'm looking forward!
                                I'll keep it in eye ,-)

                                OK, I've [...] grabbed a shiny new 2.33 one, I'm wishing it all best...

                                Unfortunately... no, it does not have to seem having helped much, the 2.33 task locked up too (at 51.724%, 25:40:31 elapsed):

                                wu_1295715071_147548_0 Workunit 2017311 Task 2072478 wrote:

                                10.02.2011 12:47:55 | WUProp@Home | Starting task wu_1295715071_163902_0 using data_collect version 233
                                10.02.2011 12:47:57 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_163902_0 checkpointed
                                ......
                                10.02.2011 18:58:57 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1295715071_163902_0 checkpointed

                                A hard crash a few minutes later:
                                <message>
                                Nesprávna funkcia. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                                </message>
                                <stderr_txt>
                                Initialisation
                                12:47:56 (16420): connection socket active_results
                                12:47:56 (16420): connection socket state
                                12:47:56 (16420): connection socket file_transfer
                                12:47:56 (16420): connection socket host_info
                                18:53:55 (16420): Timeout reception.
                                18:53:55 (16420): data incomplete.
                                19:01:49 (16420): erreur chargement file_transfer Start-end tags mismatch

                                Unhandled Exception Detected...

                                - Unhandled Exception Record -
                                Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004209CD read attempt to address 0x160FA9D2

                                Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...
                                </stderr_txt>


                                Note that the reason for AccVio seems to be different now...

                                Peter

                                Profile [AF>WildWildWest]Sebastien

                                Project administrator
                                Avatar
                                Send message
                                Joined: Mar 28 10
                                Posts: 155
                                Credit: 128,450
                                RAC: 123
                                Message 450 - Posted 11 Feb 2011 21:21:58 UTC - in response to Message 449.

                                  I released version 2.34.
                                  The workunit should finish when the error "erreur chargement file_transfer" occurs.
                                  ____________

                                  Profile Nikolay A. Saharov

                                  Volunteer translator
                                  Send message
                                  Joined: Mar 28 10
                                  Posts: 9
                                  Credit: 73,803
                                  RAC: 71
                                  Message 459 - Posted 14 Feb 2011 10:00:01 UTC

                                    My PC can access the internet only once a day.

                                    Is it possible to add proj preference how long WUs should run? I.e. 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours.

                                    Pepo
                                    Avatar
                                    Send message
                                    Joined: May 10 10
                                    Posts: 15
                                    Credit: 49,025
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 460 - Posted 14 Feb 2011 13:00:20 UTC - in response to Message 450.

                                      I released version 2.34.
                                      The workunit should finish when the error "erreur chargement file_transfer" occurs.

                                      Possibly... But what about "Start-end tags mismatch"? The 2.34 task locked up too (at 43.448%, now 46:43:48 elapsed):

                                      wu_1297456788_5943_0 Workunit 2051979 Task 2108419 wrote:

                                      12.02.2011 14:38:45 | WUProp@Home | Starting task wu_1297456788_5943_0 using data_collect version 234
                                      12.02.2011 14:38:48 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1297456788_5943_0 checkpointed
                                      ......
                                      12.02.2011 19:48:51 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1297456788_5943_0 checkpointed

                                      A hard crash a few minutes later:
                                      <message>
                                      Nesprávna funkcia. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                                      </message>
                                      <stderr_txt>
                                      Initialisation
                                      14:38:46 (22488): connection socket active_results
                                      14:38:46 (22488): connection socket state
                                      14:38:46 (22488): connection socket file_transfer
                                      14:38:46 (22488): connection socket host_info
                                      16:01:57 (22488): Timeout reception.
                                      16:01:57 (22488): data incomplete.
                                      19:49:47 (22488): Timeout reception.
                                      19:49:47 (22488): data incomplete.
                                      19:49:51 (22488): erreur chargement file_transfer Start-end tags mismatch

                                      Unhandled Exception Detected...

                                      - Unhandled Exception Record -
                                      Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004209CD read attempt to address 0xA2100065

                                      Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...
                                      </stderr_txt>


                                      Note that the reason for AccVio seems to match the 2.33 version.

                                      Peter

                                      Pepo
                                      Avatar
                                      Send message
                                      Joined: May 10 10
                                      Posts: 15
                                      Credit: 49,025
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 463 - Posted 15 Feb 2011 11:34:51 UTC - in response to Message 460.

                                        I released version 2.34.
                                        The workunit should finish when the error "erreur chargement file_transfer" occurs.

                                        Possibly... But what about "Start-end tags mismatch"? The 2.34 task locked up too (at 43.448%, now 46:43:48 elapsed).

                                        Now a 2.35 locked-up task (at 11.034%, 10:09:11 elapsed). The <stderr_txt> seems to be terminated by a large block of character data (an unterminated list of other projects' transfers, from <boinc_gui_rpc_reply>, some unterminated string or memory overflow just at the crash? (The block seems to be just a bit more than 4 kB - the usual file transfer block...)

                                        wu_1297456788_26894_0 Workunit 2072930 Task 2130214 wrote:

                                        15.02.2011 1:25:47 | WUProp@Home | Starting task wu_1297456788_26894_0 using data_collect version 235
                                        15.02.2011 1:26:03 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1297456788_26894_0 checkpointed
                                        15.02.2011 2:36:08 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1297456788_26894_0 checkpointed
                                        ......
                                        15.02.2011 2:41:10 | WUProp@Home | [task] result wu_1297456788_26894_0 checkpointed

                                        A hard crash a few seconds later:
                                        <message>
                                        Nesprávna funkcia. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                                        </message>
                                        <stderr_txt>
                                        Initialisation
                                        01:26:02 (25160): connection socket active_results
                                        01:26:02 (25160): connection socket state
                                        01:26:02 (25160): connection socket file_transfer
                                        01:26:02 (25160): connection socket host_info
                                        02:41:06 (25160): Timeout reception.
                                        02:41:06 (25160): data incomplete.
                                        02:41:35 (25160): erreur chargement file_transfer Start-end tags mismatch <boinc_gui_rpc_reply>
                                        <file_transfers>
                                        <file_transfer>
                                        <project_url>http.//setiathome.berkeley.edu/</project_url>
                                        <project_name>SETI@home</project_name>
                                        <name>31my10ab.19370.391277.14.10.150</name>
                                        <nbytes>375337.000000</nbytes>
                                        <max_nbytes>0.000000</max_nbytes>
                                        <status>0</status>
                                        <persistent_file_xfer>
                                        <num_retries>44</num_retries>
                                        <first_request_time>1296830886.620766</first_request_time>
                                        <next_request_time>1297772809.959487</next_request_time>
                                        <time_so_far>317.368349</time_so_far>
                                        <last_bytes_xferred>52397.000000</last_bytes_xferred>
                                        </persistent_file_xfer>
                                        </file_transfer>
                                        <file_transfer>
                                        <project_url>http.//setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/</project_url>
                                        <project_name>SETI@home Beta Test</project_name>
                                        <name>ap_06no10ad_B3_P1_00144_20110123_03759.wu</name>
                                        <nbytes>8392046.000000</nbytes>
                                        <max_nbytes>0.000000</max_nbytes>
                                        <status>0</status>
                                        <persistent_file_xfer>
                                        <num_retries>39</num_retries>
                                        <first_request_time>1296921440.453398</first_request_time>
                                        <next_request_time>1297734925.966553</next_request_time>
                                        <time_so_far>313.892300</time_so_far>
                                        <last_bytes_xferred>552109.000000</last_bytes_xferred>
                                        </persistent_file_xfer>
                                        </file_transfer>
                                        <file_transfer>
                                        <project_url>http.//www.worldcommunitygrid.org/</project_url>
                                        <project_name>World Community Grid</project_name>
                                        <name>E201216_364_A.28.C23H13NS3Se.78.0.set1d06_1_4</name>
                                        <nbytes>29968736.000000</nbytes>
                                        <max_nbytes>152428800.000000</max_nbytes>
                                        <status>1</status>
                                        <generated_locally/>
                                        <upload_when_present/>
                                        <persistent_file_xfer>
                                        <num_retries>0</num_retries>
                                        <first_request_time>1297734069.663286</first_request_time>
                                        <next_request_time>1297734069.663286</next_request_time>
                                        <time_so_far>19.809982</time_so_far>
                                        <last_bytes_xferred>2605056.000000</last_bytes_xferred>
                                        </persistent_file_xfer>
                                        <file_xfer>
                                        <bytes_xferred>2637824.000000</bytes_xferred>
                                        <file_offset>0.000000</file_offset>
                                        <xfer_speed>151784.550684</xfer_speed>
                                        <url>https.//cleanenergy.worldcommunitygrid.org/prod/cep2/file_upload_handler</url>
                                        </file_xfer>
                                        </file_transfer>
                                        </file_transfers>
                                        </boinc_gui_rpc_reply>
                                        <boinc_gui_rpc_reply>
                                        <file_transfers>
                                        <file_transfer>
                                        <project_url>http.//setiathome.berkeley.edu/</project_url>
                                        <project_name>SETI@home</project_name>
                                        <name>31my10ab.19370.391277.14.10.150</name>
                                        <nbytes>375337.000000</nbytes>
                                        <max_nbytes>0.000000</max_nbytes>
                                        <status>0</status>
                                        <persistent_file_xfer>
                                        <num_retries>44</num_retries>
                                        <first_request_time>1296830886.620766</first_request_time>
                                        <next_request_time>1297772809.959487</next_request_time>
                                        <time_so_far>317.368349</time_so_far>
                                        <last_bytes_xferred>52397.000000</last_bytes_xferred>
                                        </persistent_file_xfer>
                                        </file_transfer>
                                        <file_transfer>
                                        <project_url>http.//setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/</project_url>
                                        <project_name>SETI@home Beta Test</project_name>
                                        <name>ap_06no10ad_B3_P1_00144_20110123_03759.wu</name>
                                        <nbytes>8392046.000000</nbytes>
                                        <max_nbytes>0.000000</max_nbytes>
                                        <status>0</status>
                                        <persistent_file_xfer>
                                        <num_retries>39</num_retries>
                                        <first_request_time>1296921440.453398</first_request_time>
                                        <next_request_time>1297734925.966553</next_request_time>
                                        <time_so_far>313.892300</time_so_far>
                                        <last_bytes_xferred>552109.000000</last_bytes_xferred>
                                        </persistent_file_xfer>
                                        </file_transfer>
                                        <file_transfer>
                                        <project_url>http.//www.worldcommunitygrid.org/</project_url>
                                        <project_name>World Community Grid</project_name>
                                        <name>E201216_364_A.28.C23H13NS3Se.78.0.set1d06_1_4</name>
                                        <nbytes>29968736.000000</nbytes>
                                        <max_nbytes>152428800.000000</max_nbytes>
                                        <status>1</status>
                                        <generated_locally/>
                                        <upload_when_present/>
                                        <persistent_file_xfer>
                                        <num_retries>0</num_retries>
                                        <first_request_time>1297734069.663286</first_r

                                        Unhandled Exception Detected...

                                        - Unhandled Exception Record -
                                        Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00412DC7 read attempt to address 0xF8C3A793

                                        Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...
                                        </stderr_txt>


                                        The reason for AccVio still does match the 2.33 and 2.34 versions.
                                        (Because of Akismet, I had to modify all URLs.)

                                        Peter

                                        Post to thread

                                        Message boards : Number crunching : Run on tasks


                                        Home | My Account | Message Boards | Results


                                        Copyright © 2013 Sebastien