WUProp not awarding credit.

Message boards : Number crunching : WUProp not awarding credit.
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
nanoprobe
   
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Feb 13
Posts: 34
Credit: 653,713
RAC: 0
Message 1837 - Posted: 16 Nov 2013, 2:05:56 UTC

I just noticed that I was only shown as having about 63 days of credit on the new WCG cancer project when I actually have over 200 days of run time. What's going on?
ID: 1837 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Sellyme
   

Send message
Joined: 21 Jul 13
Posts: 69
Credit: 691,597
RAC: 0
Message 1839 - Posted: 16 Nov 2013, 4:32:19 UTC

Mine seems to be working fine:



(WCG has fewer hours as WUProp doesn't need to wait for validation.)
ID: 1839 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [AF>WildWildWest] Sébastie...
     
Project administrator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 10
Posts: 2871
Credit: 538,673
RAC: 133
Message 1840 - Posted: 16 Nov 2013, 7:47:42 UTC - in response to Message 1837.  

I just noticed that I was only shown as having about 63 days of credit on the new WCG cancer project when I actually have over 200 days of run time. What's going on?

You cheat by multiplying by 8 the number of cores.
So, only 1/8 of the computing hours will be validated.

ID: 1840 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
nanoprobe
   
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Feb 13
Posts: 34
Credit: 653,713
RAC: 0
Message 1844 - Posted: 17 Nov 2013, 4:00:44 UTC - in response to Message 1840.  
Last modified: 17 Nov 2013, 4:03:26 UTC

I just noticed that I was only shown as having about 63 days of credit on the new WCG cancer project when I actually have over 200 days of run time. What's going on?

You cheat by multiplying by 8 the number of cores.
So, only 1/8 of the computing hours will be validated.

I cheat? Really? Interesting response but your math doesn't add up. If I was only getting 1/8 of the run time validated by the project then WUProp should be showing only about 30 days of run time. If I'm not going to get credit for the same amount of run time here that the project gives me then I see no point in running WUprop. I've received no run time credit here at all for the last beta that ran for 2 days. CYA.

ID: 1844 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Sellyme
   

Send message
Joined: 21 Jul 13
Posts: 69
Credit: 691,597
RAC: 0
Message 1845 - Posted: 17 Nov 2013, 10:36:29 UTC - in response to Message 1844.  

I've received no run time credit here at all for the last beta that ran for 2 days. CYA.


Last I checked, the beta test appears as a different task entirely, and shows up as something along the lines of "Beta Test" instead of the actual project name. I can't verify this, however, as you have your account data hidden.
ID: 1845 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
nanoprobe
   
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Feb 13
Posts: 34
Credit: 653,713
RAC: 0
Message 1846 - Posted: 17 Nov 2013, 14:57:37 UTC - in response to Message 1845.  
Last modified: 17 Nov 2013, 14:59:30 UTC

I've received no run time credit here at all for the last beta that ran for 2 days. CYA.


Last I checked, the beta test appears as a different task entirely, and shows up as something along the lines of "Beta Test" instead of the actual project name. I can't verify this, however, as you have your account data hidden.

The task is listed as "beta test" however there has been no run time credit for the 2 days it was running earlier this week. Actually it should have shown up as "MCM1 beta test" because it was an entirely different beta test run. I'm not the only person noticing that there are projects being run that are not being granted run time here. Others at SETIUSA have noticed the same thing. Until this issue is resolved I will stop running WUProp.
ID: 1846 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
       
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 10
Posts: 453
Credit: 945,109
RAC: 0
Message 1852 - Posted: 17 Nov 2013, 22:01:04 UTC - in response to Message 1846.  
Last modified: 17 Nov 2013, 22:41:01 UTC

Here the Beta test was just called
World Community Grid 	Beta Test

The reason it wasn't called,
World Community Grid 	Mapping Cancer Markers Beta
was because it was a pre-release Beta of an unnamed/unannounced project. Subsequent testing of MCM will indicate the sub-project. That's just down to how WCG does things, and it's good for here as the next new project will be tested and hopefully count towards the same app (but that's down to seb).
The Beta app name as I viewed it from a running WU's properties within Boinc Manager was Beta Test 7.19.
The present (non-Beta) app is called Mapping Cancer Markers 7.24 but just appears here as, World Community Grid Mapping Cancer Markers.

My testing of the Beta revealed that it sort-off restarted from zero if it was suspended in any way.
I suspect that may be the source of your annoyance - the WUProp app is somehow being tricked into thinking the task is just starting when it's actually restarting and had already ran for some time. WCG has suspended the project. Maybe the problems are related?

My suggestion is to set Boinc Manager's Switch Between Apps every Preference setting to a very high number such as 990h and allow the CPU to be used while you use the system.

Hope that helps.

BTW. I just noticed that when you restart a system, and Boinc auto-starts, it runs a CPU Benchmark test. This suspends the WUProp app. However, when this is occurring Boinc still uploads work!
If my understanding of how WUProp works, this is an issue as you will not get credit at WUProp for that work. Some of it might appear in Pending but will never make it to the Running Time hours tally.
Maybe one for the devs?
=sticky tape=
ID: 1852 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
nanoprobe
   
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Feb 13
Posts: 34
Credit: 653,713
RAC: 0
Message 1856 - Posted: 18 Nov 2013, 16:31:15 UTC - in response to Message 1852.  
Last modified: 18 Nov 2013, 16:45:30 UTC

There was a second beta test the was exclusive to MCM1 to test issues with the first release of MCM1 tasks.
Project Name: Beta - Mapping Cancer Markers
Created: 11/15/2013 14:52:14
Name: BETA_MCM1_9999975_5347
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 2

Whatever the beta test was called I received no credit for the final 2 days of the MCM beta run and like I stated before I received nowhere near the amount of credit here for the run time I have on the MCM1 project.
If you're trying to upgrade your run time badges here and you're not receiving full credit for the amount of run time the project says you have then why bother running WUProp at all? Not worth it to me.

My testing of the Beta revealed that it sort-off restarted from zero if it was suspended in any way.
I suspect that may be the source of your annoyance - the WUProp app is somehow being tricked into thinking the task is just starting when it's actually restarting and had already ran for some time. WCG has suspended the project. Maybe the problems are related?

WCG suspended the project because the same tasks were getting sent out over and over again even though they had different batch numbers. The MCM beta was to test a fix for that issue.

BTW. I just noticed that when you restart a system, and Boinc auto-starts, it runs a CPU Benchmark test. This suspends the WUProp app. However, when this is occurring Boinc still uploads work!
If my understanding of how WUProp works, this is an issue as you will not get credit at WUProp for that work. Some of it might appear in Pending but will never make it to the Running Time hours tally.
Maybe one for the devs?

Add the <skip_cpu_benchmarks>1</skip_cpu_benchmarks> tag to your cc_config file to stop that annoying process. Mine are all set to skip benchmarks but I'm not even sure the newer versions of the BOINC client even run benchmarks any more.
ID: 1856 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Sellyme
   

Send message
Joined: 21 Jul 13
Posts: 69
Credit: 691,597
RAC: 0
Message 1857 - Posted: 18 Nov 2013, 16:50:01 UTC - in response to Message 1856.  

I'm not even sure the newer versions of the BOINC client even run benchmarks any more.

They do.
ID: 1857 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [AF>WildWildWest] Sébastie...
     
Project administrator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 10
Posts: 2871
Credit: 538,673
RAC: 133
Message 1858 - Posted: 20 Nov 2013, 19:25:09 UTC

Version 4.13 shoud fix the problem.
ID: 1858 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
nanoprobe
   
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Feb 13
Posts: 34
Credit: 653,713
RAC: 0
Message 1861 - Posted: 25 Nov 2013, 20:58:35 UTC - in response to Message 1858.  
Last modified: 25 Nov 2013, 21:07:51 UTC

Version 4.13 shoud fix the problem.

It seems to be working better for some projects but not for all.
ID: 1861 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
nanoprobe
   
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Feb 13
Posts: 34
Credit: 653,713
RAC: 0
Message 1863 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013, 2:30:21 UTC - in response to Message 1858.  

Version 4.13 shoud fix the problem.

There are still discrepencies with projects that run with a VM (Beauty@LCN) and projects that are NCI.(Quake catcher network)
Beauty@LCN has 96 hours of credit for me on their website. Only 56 hours of credit here with 3.60 hours pending.
QCN has 144 hours of run time and only 63 hours pending here.
ID: 1863 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [AF>WildWildWest] Sébastie...
     
Project administrator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 10
Posts: 2871
Credit: 538,673
RAC: 133
Message 1864 - Posted: 28 Nov 2013, 18:03:46 UTC - in response to Message 1863.  

I didn't see what's wrong.
On last 24 hours, your host runs 24 hours on QCN and Beauty:
http://wuprop.boinc-af.org/activity.py?hostid=49078&preselect=day
ID: 1864 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
       
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 10
Posts: 453
Credit: 945,109
RAC: 0
Message 1871 - Posted: 2 Dec 2013, 17:17:41 UTC - in response to Message 1864.  

My Running time (hours) and pending hours for Docking are always rising, but Pending never seems to move to Running time (hours):

Docking Charmm 34a2 13,835.77 1,779.27

Might this be due to a service install somewhere?
=sticky tape=
ID: 1871 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John P. Myers
   

Send message
Joined: 30 Mar 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 393,597
RAC: 0
Message 1899 - Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 9:14:47 UTC

Is there a limit to how many workunits WuProp can report at a time? Is it capped at 8 or something? This could explain why many people find they're missing quite a few hours.

Like Nanoprobe, WuProp only credits me with 110 hours on WCG MCM, but WCG reports i have 81+ days of results, plus 4 pages of pendings. This discrepancy is retarded beyond words...unless WuProp has some cap where it can't report every WU from a given session. I don't just mean a cap on the number of WUs completed, but the number of WUs completed from *different projects* might be causing WuProp to miss quite a bit.

WCG isn't the only project where i'm missing hours. In fact nearly anything i run on my 3770K system is horribly under-reported, but, including WuProp, i have 9 NCI WUs crunching simultaneously on that computer, along with 4 GPUs and whatever is left of the 8 CPU threads. WuProp reports the earthquake-related NCI WUs just fine. Never misses a beat. Anything else...well, let's just say i gave up on any hopes of decent looking WuProp badge a long time ago.
ID: 1899 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [AF>WildWildWest] Sébastie...
     
Project administrator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 10
Posts: 2871
Credit: 538,673
RAC: 133
Message 1901 - Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 10:04:10 UTC - in response to Message 1899.  

Your 3770K didn't report any workunits since November 8th: http://wuprop.boinc-af.org/activity.py?hostid=4678
ID: 1901 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John P. Myers
   

Send message
Joined: 30 Mar 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 393,597
RAC: 0
Message 1902 - Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 19:03:30 UTC - in response to Message 1901.  

Right...and i wonder why that would be since that computer runs 24/7 with a wired 30 Mb/s internet connection. And before Nov. 8th there are several more gaps ranging from several hours to several days. My cat must've done it. That's it :p

Oh well. Nothing can be done about it but wait around around for the next gap and look for clues.
ID: 1902 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : WUProp not awarding credit.

©2024 Sébastien