What is this "inactive for 30 days or more" icon?
log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : What is this "inactive for 30 days or more" icon?
1 · 2 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Hi, | |
ID: 2379 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
They also don't seem to be terribly accurate. Why not just add a column for the activity on each project within the last 30 days? | |
ID: 2385 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
No, not accurate. I admit to having RAC over 0.1 in only 6 projects currently, so I should be seeing a lot more red Xs. A few of them make sense, since the projects are inactive (e.g. Sudoku, SubSetSum) or have been shut down for good, or moved, or whatever. | |
ID: 2386 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
No, not accurate. I believe they are just projects that this project has not received updates on in over 30 days, not just your account. The wording could be better in the headers to reflect this. I like the red italics. Much better than that bullet red X that makes me think something went wrong or I need to "click to fix/close". ____________ My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242 | |
ID: 2387 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Explanation under "Application" -text should be much shorter, with this long explanation in "Project" column project names are in two rows which makes table much more longer and harder to read. | |
ID: 2388 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Explanation under "Application" -text should be much shorter, with this long explanation in "Project" column project names are in two rows which makes table much more longer and harder to read. Yeah, isn't necessary to put it on every 20 app section anyway, it would be enough when it would be listed once over the entire section. Maybe simple color code will be enough? Applications in Red have been inactive in last 30 days. Hm, since 30 days look quite short to me (some of the projects sometimes have a more or less small pause) how about making it: 30 days could be in orange text, and 60 days in red. ____________ Life is Science, and Science rules. To the universe and beyond Member of BOINC@Heidelberg My BOINC-Stats | |
ID: 2389 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well, this seems to have stimulated some discussion, which is healthy. :-) | |
ID: 2390 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Looking over my apps list here I found several other DEAD Projects and/or Applications within Active Projects that are no longer running.... Below is my list:
Docking /// Charmm 34a2 DEAD PROJECT Einstein@Home /// Gamma-ray pulsar search #2 DEAD APPLICATION qos /// Quality of Service using Volunteer Computing DEAD PROJECT SETI@home /// SETI@home Enhanced DEAD APPLICATION GPUGRID /// CPU only app DEAD APPLICATION
| |
ID: 2391 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Oh hey, what do you know - my idea had some bearing on the changes. That's always nice to see - project admins who care what their crunchers think. You'd be surprised how often that's not the case... | |
ID: 2392 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I like the inactive apps being identified. | |
ID: 2394 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Project Admins: Thank you very much for the recent updates and listening to us users! Docking /// Charmm 34a2 DEAD PROJECT ____________ | |
ID: 2395 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I like the inactive apps being identified. Totally agree, the inactive apps allow me to quickly work out what I might be able to crunch. It's also good for those intermittent projects; you know there isn't any work without going to the site and looking at their server status. Another benefit is that you can work out the apps that are not being reported. If you are running tasks but the app appears in red, then you know there is a problem with the wuprop app (it's not reporting the hours for anyone). For example,
-> Docking Charmm 34a2 25,249.52 0.00 (when tasks are still being reported, but project has announced its retirement and isn't sending new work) => Docking Charmm 34a2 25,249.52 0.00 | |
ID: 2415 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have been processing work for | |
ID: 2416 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
On my account they are being credited under: | |
ID: 2417 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
On my account they are being credited under: Curious, as I don't have any Android and I am not using any GPU cards, all my work is on CPU. It appears to be crediting OK just that it shows as inactive (I even show pending work against this app). As I understand it Albert still allows CPU work for the Arecibo data but not Einstein which uses GPUs. Conan ____________ | |
ID: 2418 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I am unsure why the following is not marked inactive: | |
ID: 2446 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
There are other dead or dormant projects that are not highlighted in red; FreeHAL@home, physics@home, SLinCA, ralph@home, possibly DistributedDataMining? | |
ID: 2448 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
ralph@home & DistributedDataMining ARE STILL ACTIVE PROJECTS | |
ID: 2449 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
DistributedDataMining seems to be running but not sure about Ralph, Unable to connect can't establish a connection to the server at ralph.bakerlab.org.
| |
ID: 2450 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
DistributedDataMining seems to be running but not sure about Ralph, Just because the server for RALPH is DOWN does not mean it is a DEAD project. It is the TEST PROJECT site for Rosetta@home and sometimes they take the site down unannounced. ____________ | |
ID: 2451 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is this "inactive for 30 days or more" icon?