New Badge Proposal
log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : New Badge Proposal
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Well WCG also isn't breaking the run time down per app on their site either. However, yes they are the only project reporting the run times as described above. Funny, my contributions to WCG are broken down by app when I look at "My Contribution" page on the WCG website. Yes, we all saw what Seb said about new badges. Aside from me explaining what I meant in my original post in this thread I don't think we are talking about that any more. The conversation has moved onto discussing tracking hours and what projects actually do so. So evidently some of us don't find the discussion pointless. | |
ID: 2857 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, we all saw what Seb said about new badges. Aside from me explaining what I meant in my original post in this thread I don't think we are talking about that any more. The conversation has moved onto discussing tracking hours and what projects actually do so. So evidently some of us don't find the discussion pointless. Agreed. ____________ | |
ID: 2858 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Well WCG also isn't breaking the run time down per app on their site either. However, yes they are the only project reporting the run times as described above. Technically Coleslaw is correct; WCG breaks the run time down per 'sub'-project, and not per app - for example, FightAIDS@Home has/had two apps:
FightAIDS@Home - Vina
| |
ID: 2862 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Screen shot where you see that. I just see totals for sub projects. Not their apps. FAAH has 2 apps and BETA has had several. So, as you saw from the post you quoted of mine just now, I too was adding clarification. The pointless part of the discussion is continuing where the project admin said he would not do. That is that. ____________ | |
ID: 2863 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
My mistake, it is indeed by sub project and not app. Then again several WCG project only run one app. | |
ID: 2864 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
My mistake, it is indeed by sub project and not app. Then again several WCG project only run one app. That is like the pot calling the kettle black don't you think? Let's rehash. You made a suggestion. I and others disagreed. The discussion moved on. You felt the need to clarify yourself and bring your idea back up after Seb was clear that he wouldn't consider total run time. Thus you are basically either disregarding the admins view or are feeling argumentative yourself.Then you asked for a list of projects that reported based on run time. skgiven brought up WCG. I answered the question by adding to his statement and also pointed out another project that did it for one of its apps. Then once again you were the one that argued stating a false truth that WCG did something they don't do. Then when not only I but skgiven points out your error, you point the finger at me for wanting to just fight with you and argue? You do know that intelligent discussion includes disagreement right? People aren't trying to attack you. They just don't agree and don't stand by when misinformation is presented as fact. You can dislike us when we correct things but that doesn't mean we want to argue. We want to be accurate and factual. ____________ | |
ID: 2865 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Coleslaw, Seb doesn't need to make a new badge on here for total run time, but it would be nice to be able to have it on http://signature.statseb.fr/ here: | |
ID: 2867 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I think many could very easily argue that for seb to create it just for hosting it on badge pages/stats sites isn't much different than having it at the project too. | |
ID: 2868 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Sigh, I made a mistake and admitted it. You act like I flat out lied on purpose to back up my argument and that wasn't the case. But what ever, your always right and every one must fall in line with your way of thinking. | |
ID: 2869 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
More Buttered Popcorn Please ... lol | |
ID: 2870 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
2 things: | |
ID: 2871 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Zombie has 3 too, in fact 1 more star than me ... | |
ID: 2874 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thank you very much for this Sebastien, it makes it a lot easier to keep track of what shape I'm in. | |
ID: 2875 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I didn't see that, Ste\/e - thanks for pointing it out :D I also see that LBC001 Has 3 badges too | |
ID: 2876 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Weeeeee! | |
ID: 2877 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
You seem excited, zombie67 [MM] :D | |
ID: 2878 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Doctor Now suggested: I like this idea. All we'd need is a single colored star superimposed on the WUProp circle, but larger than the current stars. We could keep the current colors too so we'd just need new 10 badges. I'd also like to suggest a third class of badge that shows how many apps you've run under 100 hours. It can be a challenge to rack these up so it's as much an achievement to get 20 obscure apps under 100 Hrs as it is to get 20 PG/Einstein apps over 100 Hrs. This badge could be identical to the current badge (5 X 20) but all the stars are white with a black border. In the signatures, each class could be selectable. Thanks for your consideration! | |
ID: 3749 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Doctor Now suggested: Personally I prefer the numerical display of Total hours:. When BOINC was created and SETI@home switched over to it. One of my biggest complains was that computational time was no longer tracked. I had brought that up during the BOINC alpha test days but no one seemed to care. | |
ID: 3752 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
One of my biggest complains was that computational time was no longer tracked. I had brought that up during the BOINC alpha test days but no one seemed to care. I don't remember that original SETI counted the computational time, but the workunit count. I had exactly crunched 2.400 units, that's the only thing I know. If they recorded the time also that would have been quite unique for such an early project, unfortunately there's no chance to look upon that, the original site might be still there, but when I want to look my stats, I get a blank page. ____________ Life is Science, and Science rules. To the universe and beyond Member of BOINC@Heidelberg My BOINC-Stats | |
ID: 3753 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
One of my biggest complains was that computational time was no longer tracked. I had brought that up during the BOINC alpha test days but no one seemed to care. You might be able to find your stats on the SETI@home classic site if you look for your team. If you still can't find your stats on the classic site get the information on your current SETI@home account page. On my account: SETI@home classic workunits 93,865 SETI@home classic CPU time 863,447 hours http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_user.php?userid=792 | |
ID: 3754 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Badge Proposal