Is calculation of hours run correct?
log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Is calculation of hours run correct?
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Yes, seems something is often getting stuck and catching up later, now my Xperia has 25.97 hours last day, which is not possible for a single core device. Never seen this so far. Perhaps they should get back to the 6 hours WUs, with them everything worked fine. "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" seems to apply here too. It could also be how the new volunteers are allocated, if someone is doing this and somedays just can't for whatever reason, but things do work out in the end all it means is a slightly delayed new badge or new color on an existing badge. Personally I don't mind a non linear progression of my stats as long as in the end I do get what I'm supposed to get. This is also ALOT better than not having wuprop at all!! | |
ID: 8934 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
It could also be how the new volunteers are allocated, if someone is doing this and somedays just can't for whatever reason I doubt someone is sitting there and adding the hours to our stats by hand, this is done by software on the server and this obviously isn't runnig properly since the introduction of the shorter WUs (what's the point of them?). as long as in the end I do get what I'm supposed to get Hard to verify currently, but probably we get what we are supposed to get, but not sure. ____________ . | |
ID: 8936 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
It could also be how the new volunteers are allocated, if someone is doing this and somedays just can't for whatever reason I agree but my thought was maybe a volunteer is now in-charge of running that script and it's not being done every hour or 5 minutes or whatever but instead every day or so as they get the time to ensure it runs and completely finishes without any errors. | |
ID: 8937 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
The not analyzed is climbing again. ATM at 35717. | |
ID: 8999 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have a problem on my calculations too on my: | |
ID: 9000 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm pretty sure this was fixed/renamed recently, and is showing total hours since that fix, which stopped the app showing in red. I don't know what else might be happening with it though. | |
ID: 9001 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I'm pretty sure this was fixed/renamed recently, and is showing total hours since that fix, which stopped the app showing in red. I don't know what else might be happening with it though. It was. Then I posted I was at like half the normal hours and there was a back of tasks. | |
ID: 9002 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Back up to 25988 not analyzed. | |
ID: 9003 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Back up to 25988 not analyzed. What are looking at to see that? When I look at my Tasks I see this: State: All (1312) · In progress (18) · Validation pending (1) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1293) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Are you saying that you have 25988 Pending? Or Inconclusive? Or something else? | |
ID: 9004 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Back up to 25988 not analyzed. He's looking at the projects Server Status page On that page, right hand side of screen look at Stats table labeled Tasks by application / FOURTH Column labeled Not analysed Currently it's at 0. If this number start growing, then there is a backlog. ____________ | |
ID: 9006 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Back up to 25988 not analyzed. Thanks I've never even looked at that page before!! I like this part of the page though: Users # With credit 9053 With recent credit 1025 Registered in past 24 hours 0 Computers # With credit 168368 With recent credit 5918 Registered in past 24 hours 11 Current GigaFLOPS 784.68 1025 current active users WITH almost 6000 pc's and 11 new pc's, some of those 'new' pc's could be me bringing mine back into the fold as I start to get all my pc's up and running again. Most of mine have been off-line for over a year so I'm guessing they qualify as 'new' ones. | |
ID: 9008 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Most of mine have been off-line for over a year so I'm guessing they qualify as 'new' ones. They qualify as new if you deleted BOINC data folder on them so they got a new host CPID. It doesn't matter how long they have been turned off as long as the server can recognize them, even detaching and reattaching usually doesn't trigger a new project host ID if the CPID didn't change. ____________ . | |
ID: 9012 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Not sure why its this one app but the last 24 hours aren't being removed. I haven't had one of these tasks since the 30th of April. | |
ID: 9014 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Not sure why its this one app but the last 24 hours aren't being removed. I haven't had one of these tasks since the 30th of April. I'm seeing the same thing 205 GPUGRID ACEMD 4: molecular dynamics simulations for GPUs 47.62 47.62 | |
ID: 9015 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Not analysed at 10784 as of 7 May 2022, 21:42:15 UTC | |
ID: 9021 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Status pages showing All analyzed at 21:57:33, which is about 10 minutes behind real time at posting. | |
ID: 9022 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
I've seen it go up and down by a lot. Currently at 24072. | |
ID: 9023 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Now 48037. | |
ID: 9024 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
My home page stats hours https://wuprop.boinc-af.org/home.php are still showing task hours from several days ago counting as "last day hours", but the "last 24 hours hosts" hours page are correct. | |
ID: 9053 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
My home page stats hours https://wuprop.boinc-af.org/home.php are still showing task hours from several days ago counting as "last day hours", but the "last 24 hours hosts" hours page are correct. I'm seeing the same thing I wonder if there is a check box or something not always being checked once the file is processed | |
ID: 9061 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is calculation of hours run correct?